Skip to content

Conversation

@SebaLukas
Copy link
Member

Describe your changes

See title

Issue ticket number and link

Without this shutdown function the java process lives until EVerest is shutting down. This means that a new Java process is created for each session.

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I read the contribution documentation and made sure that my changes meet its requirements

mlitre
mlitre previously approved these changes Jan 15, 2026
@mlitre
Copy link
Contributor

mlitre commented Jan 15, 2026

Just needs Josev updated

@SebaLukas SebaLukas force-pushed the fix/shutdown_java_process_after_session branch from 1c68dc1 to 8016e51 Compare January 16, 2026 07:31
@SebaLukas SebaLukas requested a review from mlitre January 16, 2026 07:32
mlitre
mlitre previously approved these changes Jan 16, 2026
@SebaLukas SebaLukas added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 16, 2026
@SebaLukas SebaLukas removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jan 16, 2026
@SebaLukas SebaLukas force-pushed the fix/shutdown_java_process_after_session branch from 8016e51 to 19c88de Compare January 16, 2026 13:17
@SebaLukas SebaLukas requested a review from mlitre January 16, 2026 13:18
@SebaLukas SebaLukas enabled auto-merge January 16, 2026 13:22
@SebaLukas SebaLukas added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 16, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 17f4932 Jan 16, 2026
12 checks passed
@SebaLukas SebaLukas deleted the fix/shutdown_java_process_after_session branch January 16, 2026 15:40
IvarWithoutBones pushed a commit to IvarWithoutBones/everest-core that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants